Because the introduction of DNA is contrary to the rule of the jacket, this is not true, since the proof of the ratio of adultery by DNA analysis applies the rule of the jacket, since the jacket is in the ratio of the child to the father and not in proportion, the lack of proportion to his father will result in the child will remain Known that he is not a legitimate father and Tmir their family .. Even the ratio of the son of adultery to his mother is a permanent disclosure and a greater need to prove the child to his father. Dr. Abd al-Muti Bayoumi, member of the Islamic Research Academy, says: It is on the side of adultery if the public say that the water of adultery is wasted, I see the introduction of some investigators including Hassan and Ibn Sirin and Erwa and Imam Abu Hanifa, where they see if the limit was established ratios, But the evidence is proven by the "DNA" and it is guaranteed as scientists said more than 99.5% do not ignore the words of these investigators, and say that the water of adultery is waste, this disregard for the interests of Muslims and did the Sharia only to achieve these interests, and where interest is then proceeded God, especially that we have in Egypt 14 thousand cases of lost marital documents, and can be solved (DNA) "to be resolved. It is important to emphasize that the statement that proof of genetic predisposition to the son of adultery will lead to the reduction of adultery. If the adulterer knows that he will bear the consequences of his crime, he will think 1,000 times that he will commit adultery if he knows that if he denies his son's inheritance, , Or that if a woman carries a pregnancy other than her husband and deny it and resort to analysis will not submit to the crime and will adjust things.
It is not the meaning that the public said that the water of adultery wasted the opinion of the public is correct, the opinion may be true in an age and is not true in another era because of the differences of reasons, and in our time, where many of the pronouns lost control and care for God, many of those who marry customarily take the paper Because the judge does not have papers, it is not as it was in the past who marries and then denies marriage, and husbands flee and leave their wives.
This is the view that the shar'i ratio is lower than the minimum wage. It is revealed to that, but the limit is that the shar'i will lower it for the existence of any suspicion. If we say 99.5% is the ratio of health DNA analysis "we prove this ratio because it is proven by the lowest presumption and in the past they prove it with hospitality. The half of the uncertainty is considered to be the suspicion in which the limit falls, but there is bound to be a warning penalty to be determined by the judge.
And this is based on the fact that in the rights must be sought for proof, and the limits must be searched for the projection, and Abu Hanifa said it is better to marry the adulterer prostitute is pregnant and establish the ratios and cover himself and herself, and in fact the woman resort to the judiciary to prove the descent of a person under the claim that he married her But if she said that a person who committed adultery carried and bore this child was recognized by her, and the man is not suspected of a half-percent flaw in the analysis of the DNA unless it is recognized after the analysis.
Recently, Dr. Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, supported the fatwa of the scholar Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi in refusing to prove the proportions of the son of adultery by analyzing the DNA, but Al-Azhar scientists allowed it, considering that it would reduce the crimes of adultery.
Dr. Ali Gomaa said that "scholars of Islamic jurisprudence have agreed to prove the descent of the mother by birth, but as for the father, it must be done through the means of legality and not otherwise."
He said: «Therefore, we consider the proof of descent to the son of adultery is not proper, and this has nothing to do with the use of DNA analysis».
It is not the meaning that the public said that the water of adultery wasted the opinion of the public is correct, the opinion may be true in an age and is not true in another era because of the differences of reasons, and in our time, where many of the pronouns lost control and care for God, many of those who marry customarily take the paper Because the judge does not have papers, it is not as it was in the past who marries and then denies marriage, and husbands flee and leave their wives.
This is the view that the shar'i ratio is lower than the minimum wage. It is revealed to that, but the limit is that the shar'i will lower it for the existence of any suspicion. If we say 99.5% is the ratio of health DNA analysis "we prove this ratio because it is proven by the lowest presumption and in the past they prove it with hospitality. The half of the uncertainty is considered to be the suspicion in which the limit falls, but there is bound to be a warning penalty to be determined by the judge.
And this is based on the fact that in the rights must be sought for proof, and the limits must be searched for the projection, and Abu Hanifa said it is better to marry the adulterer prostitute is pregnant and establish the ratios and cover himself and herself, and in fact the woman resort to the judiciary to prove the descent of a person under the claim that he married her But if she said that a person who committed adultery carried and bore this child was recognized by her, and the man is not suspected of a half-percent flaw in the analysis of the DNA unless it is recognized after the analysis.
Recently, Dr. Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, supported the fatwa of the scholar Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi in refusing to prove the proportions of the son of adultery by analyzing the DNA, but Al-Azhar scientists allowed it, considering that it would reduce the crimes of adultery.
Dr. Ali Gomaa said that "scholars of Islamic jurisprudence have agreed to prove the descent of the mother by birth, but as for the father, it must be done through the means of legality and not otherwise."
He said: «Therefore, we consider the proof of descent to the son of adultery is not proper, and this has nothing to do with the use of DNA analysis».
