Some Al-Azhar scholars have permitted the use of DNA analysis to prove adultery. Dr. Abdul Muti Bayoumi, a member of the Islamic Research Academy in Al-Azhar, said: "To say that adultery is wasteful - that is to say, it is not recognized - ignores the interests of Muslims. He pointed to the existence of 14 thousand cases in Egypt in which marriage documents were lost, and can be proven by DNA analysis.
Dr. Bayoumi stressed that proving the descent of the DNA, especially for the child of adultery, would lead to the reduction of the crimes of adultery because the adulterer, if he realized that he would bear the consequences of his crime, would think a thousand times before committing adultery. He explained that the way to prove the share of Sharia differs from his view to establish the limit of adultery, in the first is proven by the lowest evidence, but in the second case falls to the limit of any suspicion.
Dr. Mohammed Raafat Othman, a member of the Islamic Research Academy, also agreed on the need to introduce DNA analysis to prove the son of adultery to his father, but differentiates between the case of married women who committed adultery and unmarried women. He said: It is permissible to attribute adultery to the adulterous woman from an unmarried woman, where a group of senior scholars, including Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn al-Qayyim, said that if the son of adultery is from a married woman, it is not permissible for the scholar to call him adultery. Among them is the Messenger of Allah (pbuh), which is the honorable saying: "The child is for the bed and for the immortal stone."
On the other hand, scholars and jurists welcomed the fatwa of Dr. Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, that there is no objection to using DNA analysis to prove the ratios of the son within the framework of marriage. However, they differed regarding the use of DNA analysis to prove the proportions of the son of adultery among those who support the fatwa, to her.
Dr. Ali Gomaa's fatwa was based on a number of requests from the Egyptian Parliament concerning the amendment and addition of a number of articles to the Family Law, which, in its entirety, indicate that the husband must perform a DNA analysis if he denies the son's proportions. The plaintiff's mother is asked, and if he refuses to undergo the analysis, it is presumed to prove his son's attribution.
The fatwa stated that "there is no objection to the right to commit evil, whether man, woman, or other party, for example, by conducting a DNA analysis when one or both of them claim that they have a marital relationship in themselves, witnesses or documents, On the basis of suspicion or a corrupt contract between them; this is to prove the proportions of a child claiming to be one or both of them born of them, and in the case of refusal of the plaintiff to carry out the analysis mentioned rejection is a strong presumption to prove the proportions of this child, and if we do not pay attention to the survival of the same marriage and the implications, Does not mean the continuation of the marriage ».
What are the cases where the footprint is used for the same proportions? Is it possible to dispense with a fingerprint on the skin? Is it permissible to rely on DNA to deny descent? Or in confirming the validity of the ratios ?.
Dr. Bayoumi stressed that proving the descent of the DNA, especially for the child of adultery, would lead to the reduction of the crimes of adultery because the adulterer, if he realized that he would bear the consequences of his crime, would think a thousand times before committing adultery. He explained that the way to prove the share of Sharia differs from his view to establish the limit of adultery, in the first is proven by the lowest evidence, but in the second case falls to the limit of any suspicion.
Dr. Mohammed Raafat Othman, a member of the Islamic Research Academy, also agreed on the need to introduce DNA analysis to prove the son of adultery to his father, but differentiates between the case of married women who committed adultery and unmarried women. He said: It is permissible to attribute adultery to the adulterous woman from an unmarried woman, where a group of senior scholars, including Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn al-Qayyim, said that if the son of adultery is from a married woman, it is not permissible for the scholar to call him adultery. Among them is the Messenger of Allah (pbuh), which is the honorable saying: "The child is for the bed and for the immortal stone."
On the other hand, scholars and jurists welcomed the fatwa of Dr. Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt, that there is no objection to using DNA analysis to prove the ratios of the son within the framework of marriage. However, they differed regarding the use of DNA analysis to prove the proportions of the son of adultery among those who support the fatwa, to her.
Dr. Ali Gomaa's fatwa was based on a number of requests from the Egyptian Parliament concerning the amendment and addition of a number of articles to the Family Law, which, in its entirety, indicate that the husband must perform a DNA analysis if he denies the son's proportions. The plaintiff's mother is asked, and if he refuses to undergo the analysis, it is presumed to prove his son's attribution.
The fatwa stated that "there is no objection to the right to commit evil, whether man, woman, or other party, for example, by conducting a DNA analysis when one or both of them claim that they have a marital relationship in themselves, witnesses or documents, On the basis of suspicion or a corrupt contract between them; this is to prove the proportions of a child claiming to be one or both of them born of them, and in the case of refusal of the plaintiff to carry out the analysis mentioned rejection is a strong presumption to prove the proportions of this child, and if we do not pay attention to the survival of the same marriage and the implications, Does not mean the continuation of the marriage ».
What are the cases where the footprint is used for the same proportions? Is it possible to dispense with a fingerprint on the skin? Is it permissible to rely on DNA to deny descent? Or in confirming the validity of the ratios ?.
