The opinion of Dr. Mohammad Raafat Othman Member of the Islamic Research Academy:
If adultery is born from a married woman, it is not permissible according to the consensus of the scholars to call him the adulterer and demand that he attribute his percentage to the rule that the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) {The boy to the bed and to the stone).
But if the son of adultery was the result of adultery by a woman who is not married, then the scholars did not agree on a specific opinion. Rather, they differed on two opinions. The first is that the ruling is also like the ruling on the son of adultery from a married woman, which is not permissible for the zaani. To his mother and this is what the majority of fuqaha 'see. The second opinion says that it is permissible for a child of adultery to be attributed to an adulterer from an unmarried woman. This was said by a group of senior scholars, including Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn al-Qayyim.
The opinion that I tend to is the last opinion, and Ibn al-Qayyim defended this view. He said that it is not with the public except the hadith of the child for the mattress, and there is no bed in the case of the unmarried woman. Hence, if a woman and a man come and say about a boy that he gave birth to them, For men, in the age in which we live, we can resort to DNA in this case.
As for the limits, the limit here must be established for their approval. Recognition is one of the means of proof, as evidenced by the Holy Quran and the Prophet's hadiths. If a woman claims that her son is adultery from a certain man and the genetic test proves that he was born, Here proves the extent of adultery.
If adultery is born from a married woman, it is not permissible according to the consensus of the scholars to call him the adulterer and demand that he attribute his percentage to the rule that the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) {The boy to the bed and to the stone).
But if the son of adultery was the result of adultery by a woman who is not married, then the scholars did not agree on a specific opinion. Rather, they differed on two opinions. The first is that the ruling is also like the ruling on the son of adultery from a married woman, which is not permissible for the zaani. To his mother and this is what the majority of fuqaha 'see. The second opinion says that it is permissible for a child of adultery to be attributed to an adulterer from an unmarried woman. This was said by a group of senior scholars, including Ibn Taymiyah and Ibn al-Qayyim.
The opinion that I tend to is the last opinion, and Ibn al-Qayyim defended this view. He said that it is not with the public except the hadith of the child for the mattress, and there is no bed in the case of the unmarried woman. Hence, if a woman and a man come and say about a boy that he gave birth to them, For men, in the age in which we live, we can resort to DNA in this case.
As for the limits, the limit here must be established for their approval. Recognition is one of the means of proof, as evidenced by the Holy Quran and the Prophet's hadiths. If a woman claims that her son is adultery from a certain man and the genetic test proves that he was born, Here proves the extent of adultery.
