In order for medical responsibility to fall on the doctor, two conditions must be met: first, there is harm and harm to the patient, and the other is a link between the actual injury and the medical error. In modern medical practice, the claim for compensation for injury is valid only if the doctor has done his work without having the right to do so, or has violated the inviolability of the laws in force in this regard, or has disregarded the obligations to which he has bound himself.
What is required of the doctor is to provide his patient with the necessary care as required by the conscience and science, and is asked only if neglected. The doctor may be subjected to different and sometimes contradictory criticisms. He may be accused of negligence for not resorting to modern methods of medical science, and he may be accused of arrogance of his approach to modern methods that have not yet been proven. Thus, we see the conservative doctor as a doctor who is both prone to criticism and criticism from the technical point of view. The doctor may also be accused sometimes of lack of foresight, negligence and non-narration and other general matters that are not specific to doctors and doctors.
What is required of the doctor is to provide his patient with the necessary care as required by the conscience and science, and is asked only if neglected. The doctor may be subjected to different and sometimes contradictory criticisms. He may be accused of negligence for not resorting to modern methods of medical science, and he may be accused of arrogance of his approach to modern methods that have not yet been proven. Thus, we see the conservative doctor as a doctor who is both prone to criticism and criticism from the technical point of view. The doctor may also be accused sometimes of lack of foresight, negligence and non-narration and other general matters that are not specific to doctors and doctors.
