Some surgeons believe that they have the right to perform any intervention that connects their patient to recovery. Some claim that such interference may occur despite sometimes reluctance. However, as we have noted through the conditions of the absence of the responsibility of the doctor in the event of the injury is the authorization of the patient to perform medication, whether medical or surgical. There are two exceptions to this mandate:
- The first case: the dangerous cases that threaten the life of the patient by death, or threaten to damage a member of the members, be unconscious or that his mental state does not allow permission, and the guardian is not present to take permission. This is also the case in cases where the patient is drugged for a particular procedure. During the surgical intervention, it was found that another necessary operation was necessary at the same time.
- The second case: Cases required by the public interest, such as infectious diseases that threaten the society of the spread of the epidemic, in this case, the health authorities may force an individual or group of people to treatment or use a means of prevention as long as it is a legitimate interest of society.
- The first case: the dangerous cases that threaten the life of the patient by death, or threaten to damage a member of the members, be unconscious or that his mental state does not allow permission, and the guardian is not present to take permission. This is also the case in cases where the patient is drugged for a particular procedure. During the surgical intervention, it was found that another necessary operation was necessary at the same time.
- The second case: Cases required by the public interest, such as infectious diseases that threaten the society of the spread of the epidemic, in this case, the health authorities may force an individual or group of people to treatment or use a means of prevention as long as it is a legitimate interest of society.
