The general medical examination shall include the examination of the physician examining the patient's condition and complaint. He shall then perform the clinical examination and, if necessary, ask for other tests to be used to arrive at the knowledge of the surgical disease.
There are three cases here:
The first case: that the responsibility is related to the examining physician alone if the person responsible for the responsibility arises from the act of the examining physician, he bears sole responsibility for him and his assistants do not bear that responsibility if the relationship between them and the positive person ceases.
An example of this case is that the diagnosis of the disease should be made with intuition and guesswork, with the means by which it can be ascertained that the disease is present and not present.
Case 2: Responsibility for Assistants:
The analyst of blood, urine and feces bears full responsibility for any error in his analysis and is responsible for the method he chooses to arrive at the results of the analysis.
The radiologist is also responsible for the method of imaging as well as the amount of radiation dose that he sent on his body and the consequent damage, as well as the responsibility for the reports written by the doctor and the results included, as well as the photographer in medical and other perspectives, all these assistants bear full responsibility From their duties, according to their specialization and field of work. The doctor shall not be considered an associate on the condition that they are qualified to perform the task to which they are required to perform and to provide medical reports relating thereto.
The third case: that the responsibility be shared between the doctor and his aides:
If the obligor is responsible for the act of the assistant and the doctor has an influence on that positive, the responsibility is shared between them. The doctor referred the patient to the radiographer or a medical forensic photographer, knowing that the photographer is not qualified for the task of radiography or binoculars. The patient's intestines or any other damage, then the responsibility lies directly with the photographer for being directly responsible for the act, and the doctor who referred the patient to him knowing that he is not eligible to E in the rhythm of the positive.
There are three cases here:
The first case: that the responsibility is related to the examining physician alone if the person responsible for the responsibility arises from the act of the examining physician, he bears sole responsibility for him and his assistants do not bear that responsibility if the relationship between them and the positive person ceases.
An example of this case is that the diagnosis of the disease should be made with intuition and guesswork, with the means by which it can be ascertained that the disease is present and not present.
Case 2: Responsibility for Assistants:
The analyst of blood, urine and feces bears full responsibility for any error in his analysis and is responsible for the method he chooses to arrive at the results of the analysis.
The radiologist is also responsible for the method of imaging as well as the amount of radiation dose that he sent on his body and the consequent damage, as well as the responsibility for the reports written by the doctor and the results included, as well as the photographer in medical and other perspectives, all these assistants bear full responsibility From their duties, according to their specialization and field of work. The doctor shall not be considered an associate on the condition that they are qualified to perform the task to which they are required to perform and to provide medical reports relating thereto.
The third case: that the responsibility be shared between the doctor and his aides:
If the obligor is responsible for the act of the assistant and the doctor has an influence on that positive, the responsibility is shared between them. The doctor referred the patient to the radiographer or a medical forensic photographer, knowing that the photographer is not qualified for the task of radiography or binoculars. The patient's intestines or any other damage, then the responsibility lies directly with the photographer for being directly responsible for the act, and the doctor who referred the patient to him knowing that he is not eligible to E in the rhythm of the positive.
