Is it permissible to break the hymen ?:
First: It is not permissible to break the hymen at all, for the following:
1 - It may lead to the mixing of genealogy, the woman may be pregnant from the previous intercourse and then marry after the dissolution membrane membrane and this leads to appendage to the husband and the mixing of halal halal.
2 - the purity of the virginity to know the evil.
3. It is easy to commit the crime of adultery.
4 - If we look at the mutation of the hymen and the consequences of the consequences of our ruling not to permit the great evils that result from it.
5 - According to the rule: "damage is still like" does not allow the girl to remove the damage by the hymen and attached to the husband.
6. He cheated.
7 - Open the doors of lying to girls and their families to hide the real reason.
8 - opens the door for doctors to resort to abortions and abortion of fetuses under the pretext of jackets.
Second: Detail:
1. If the cause of the rupture is an accident or an act that is not regarded as a sin or a sin in the marriage contract,
A - If it is assumed that the girl will meet Anta and injustice because of customs and traditions was required.
(B) If this does not prevail, the doctor shall have assumed that he was a delegate.
2 - If the cause of the rupture and slow in the marriage contract as in absolute or was due to adultery famous among the people, it is forbidden to conduct.
3 - If the cause of the ripening of adultery was not known among the people, the doctor was a choice between conducting it and not to conduct it first.
And by Dr. Mohammed Naim Yassin and cited as follows:
1 - The texts of the legitimacy of the legitimacy of the jackets and scarves and hymen hymen is assigned to achieve this in the circumstances that we ruled permissible to do it.
This is due to the fact that the required cover is the one that saw the texts of Islam as a means, and the hymen of the hymen did not materialize, but rather the sanctity of it, to the place of uncovering the nakedness and opening the door of corruption.
2 - that the woman is innocent of obscene, and if we allow him to do dermatological surgery, we have closed the door of misgivings about it, so there is a payment for injustice on it, and in order to achieve what the legal texts have seen as being intended for good faith in believers and believers.
The answer is that closing the door of mistrust can be achieved by informing before marriage, if the husband is satisfied with the woman, otherwise Allaah will compensate her.
3- If the woman hides the hymen, it is obligatory to pay the harm to the woman's family. If the woman is left without a divorce, and the husband is informed of that, she will harm her and harm her family. If it is common among the people, that family may refrain from the husband, so it is permissible for them to pay that harm. .
It is answered that the above mentioned corruption does not disappear entirely through the process of darning the possibility of being informed about it, even by telling others about it. Then this spoiler falls in the case of marriage to a woman without telling her husband to leave her karet, and it is necessary to tell him and know him.
4 - The spoiler of cheating in the trilogy of the hymen is not present in the cases where we ruled that it is permissible to ditch it.
5 - The spoiler of cheating in the trilogy of the hymen is not present in the circumstances where we ruled that it is permissible to thin it.
If we concede that cheating on a husband is invalid in the event of her disappearance by jumping and so on, which necessitates the disappearance of the virginity of nature, we do not admit that adultery is invalid in the event of her disappearance by assaulting her.
This is added to:
1 - The filling of the pretext, which was considered by the owners of the first statement is important, especially with respect to the violation of the sanctity of the child and the birth and spoilage is no doubt to say the permissibility of hymen hymen.
2 - The origin requires the inviolability of uncovering the nakedness and touch and look at it, and the excuses mentioned by the owners of the second statement is not strong enough to be able to exclude darn.
3 - that the spoiler of the charge can be removed by a medical certificate after the incident prove the innocence of women, and this is the best ways, and the need to darn.
First: It is not permissible to break the hymen at all, for the following:
1 - It may lead to the mixing of genealogy, the woman may be pregnant from the previous intercourse and then marry after the dissolution membrane membrane and this leads to appendage to the husband and the mixing of halal halal.
2 - the purity of the virginity to know the evil.
3. It is easy to commit the crime of adultery.
4 - If we look at the mutation of the hymen and the consequences of the consequences of our ruling not to permit the great evils that result from it.
5 - According to the rule: "damage is still like" does not allow the girl to remove the damage by the hymen and attached to the husband.
6. He cheated.
7 - Open the doors of lying to girls and their families to hide the real reason.
8 - opens the door for doctors to resort to abortions and abortion of fetuses under the pretext of jackets.
Second: Detail:
1. If the cause of the rupture is an accident or an act that is not regarded as a sin or a sin in the marriage contract,
A - If it is assumed that the girl will meet Anta and injustice because of customs and traditions was required.
(B) If this does not prevail, the doctor shall have assumed that he was a delegate.
2 - If the cause of the rupture and slow in the marriage contract as in absolute or was due to adultery famous among the people, it is forbidden to conduct.
3 - If the cause of the ripening of adultery was not known among the people, the doctor was a choice between conducting it and not to conduct it first.
And by Dr. Mohammed Naim Yassin and cited as follows:
1 - The texts of the legitimacy of the legitimacy of the jackets and scarves and hymen hymen is assigned to achieve this in the circumstances that we ruled permissible to do it.
This is due to the fact that the required cover is the one that saw the texts of Islam as a means, and the hymen of the hymen did not materialize, but rather the sanctity of it, to the place of uncovering the nakedness and opening the door of corruption.
2 - that the woman is innocent of obscene, and if we allow him to do dermatological surgery, we have closed the door of misgivings about it, so there is a payment for injustice on it, and in order to achieve what the legal texts have seen as being intended for good faith in believers and believers.
The answer is that closing the door of mistrust can be achieved by informing before marriage, if the husband is satisfied with the woman, otherwise Allaah will compensate her.
3- If the woman hides the hymen, it is obligatory to pay the harm to the woman's family. If the woman is left without a divorce, and the husband is informed of that, she will harm her and harm her family. If it is common among the people, that family may refrain from the husband, so it is permissible for them to pay that harm. .
It is answered that the above mentioned corruption does not disappear entirely through the process of darning the possibility of being informed about it, even by telling others about it. Then this spoiler falls in the case of marriage to a woman without telling her husband to leave her karet, and it is necessary to tell him and know him.
4 - The spoiler of cheating in the trilogy of the hymen is not present in the cases where we ruled that it is permissible to ditch it.
5 - The spoiler of cheating in the trilogy of the hymen is not present in the circumstances where we ruled that it is permissible to thin it.
If we concede that cheating on a husband is invalid in the event of her disappearance by jumping and so on, which necessitates the disappearance of the virginity of nature, we do not admit that adultery is invalid in the event of her disappearance by assaulting her.
This is added to:
1 - The filling of the pretext, which was considered by the owners of the first statement is important, especially with respect to the violation of the sanctity of the child and the birth and spoilage is no doubt to say the permissibility of hymen hymen.
2 - The origin requires the inviolability of uncovering the nakedness and touch and look at it, and the excuses mentioned by the owners of the second statement is not strong enough to be able to exclude darn.
3 - that the spoiler of the charge can be removed by a medical certificate after the incident prove the innocence of women, and this is the best ways, and the need to darn.