The doctor's duty to inform the patient of the truth of his illness, even if he is a duty to him, this duty represents a right of the patient, a personal right relating to his literary and physical or physical entity, there is no more important for any person of his health and the risks that may come.
There are two types of risks that a patient may experience:
First: normal and expected risks.
The second: unusual and unexpected risks.
The usual risks are expected to be told by the doctor. Unusual and unexpected risks, the law almost combines that the doctor does not commit to turn the patient to the rare anomaly, does not ask the doctor who supervises a woman is about to put her pregnancy to tell her that two in a thousand pregnant women die during childbirth, or tell the The appendectomy provides that each anesthetic is potentially fatal. It is sufficient to inform the patient of the risks that are usually expected, by giving a reasonable idea of his or her condition, to allow him to make an adult and wise decision.
According to some jurists, the doctor should make the patient aware of the reality of his or her condition, however difficult it may be. The patient has the right to be the master himself. Therefore, no therapeutic intervention is permitted in principle until the patient is fully enlightened and has his consent. It is an error that requires the doctor's responsibility.
There are some cases in which the doctor is obliged to inform the patient fully, and be aware of all the risks that can be exposed, even if exceptional, as in the plastic surgery.
The obligation to be enlightened depends on the state of urgency and necessity:
Whenever treatment is necessary and urgent, the scope of the doctor's commitment to insight has been minimal.
If the purpose of the medical intervention is to improve the patient's general health condition, the doctor should inform the patient fully and see all the risks, even if they are exceptional, such as plastic surgery, non-therapeutic tests and so on.
The doctor should also be aware of the patient's mental and moral state so as not to adversely affect the patient's condition.
It may be the faith of some patients God Almighty, and will be strong, and the doctor to inform the patient the reality of his illness, will help him to adhere to the treatment and maintain his health for fear of deterioration, and fear of the aggravation of the disease. In this case, the doctor assesses these conditions and tells the patient about the reality of his illness and how dangerous it is.
On the other hand, there are some patients who are characterized by their concern and obsession, then the doctor should maintain the state of the patient psychological, not see all the facts, because it may lead to harm his interest, but may lead to a huge impact on his health, The safety of his thinking, and his appreciation of things.
The jurists say: "If the patient knows - in many cases - all the effects of his illness, and the dimensions of the resulting adverse reactions to the treatment, and even some patients if the doctor to disclose all the expectations known and future, this may lead them to refuse all treatment "He said.
In this case, however, it is necessary to inform the patient's close friends of these matters.
In summary: The doctor is committed to enlighten the patient the dangers of treatment and surgical intervention, especially, and pain resulting, and the doctor is exempted from this obligation only if it is causing serious harm to the patient, and do more harm than useful.
However, a surgical condition may occur during surgery, and it is not possible for the doctor to obtain the patient's consent. The doctor may perform the required surgery on the patient based on the previous consent.
We emphasize that the surgeon or his assistant should inform the patient's close associates, usually in front of the operating room, during surgery.
The doctor should explain to the patient what happened to him and the reason for that urgent surgical intervention.
There is nothing better than establishing a relationship of trust and harmony between the patient and the doctor. And do not forget the importance of the relationship between the doctor and the patient.
There are two types of risks that a patient may experience:
First: normal and expected risks.
The second: unusual and unexpected risks.
The usual risks are expected to be told by the doctor. Unusual and unexpected risks, the law almost combines that the doctor does not commit to turn the patient to the rare anomaly, does not ask the doctor who supervises a woman is about to put her pregnancy to tell her that two in a thousand pregnant women die during childbirth, or tell the The appendectomy provides that each anesthetic is potentially fatal. It is sufficient to inform the patient of the risks that are usually expected, by giving a reasonable idea of his or her condition, to allow him to make an adult and wise decision.
According to some jurists, the doctor should make the patient aware of the reality of his or her condition, however difficult it may be. The patient has the right to be the master himself. Therefore, no therapeutic intervention is permitted in principle until the patient is fully enlightened and has his consent. It is an error that requires the doctor's responsibility.
There are some cases in which the doctor is obliged to inform the patient fully, and be aware of all the risks that can be exposed, even if exceptional, as in the plastic surgery.
The obligation to be enlightened depends on the state of urgency and necessity:
Whenever treatment is necessary and urgent, the scope of the doctor's commitment to insight has been minimal.
If the purpose of the medical intervention is to improve the patient's general health condition, the doctor should inform the patient fully and see all the risks, even if they are exceptional, such as plastic surgery, non-therapeutic tests and so on.
The doctor should also be aware of the patient's mental and moral state so as not to adversely affect the patient's condition.
It may be the faith of some patients God Almighty, and will be strong, and the doctor to inform the patient the reality of his illness, will help him to adhere to the treatment and maintain his health for fear of deterioration, and fear of the aggravation of the disease. In this case, the doctor assesses these conditions and tells the patient about the reality of his illness and how dangerous it is.
On the other hand, there are some patients who are characterized by their concern and obsession, then the doctor should maintain the state of the patient psychological, not see all the facts, because it may lead to harm his interest, but may lead to a huge impact on his health, The safety of his thinking, and his appreciation of things.
The jurists say: "If the patient knows - in many cases - all the effects of his illness, and the dimensions of the resulting adverse reactions to the treatment, and even some patients if the doctor to disclose all the expectations known and future, this may lead them to refuse all treatment "He said.
In this case, however, it is necessary to inform the patient's close friends of these matters.
In summary: The doctor is committed to enlighten the patient the dangers of treatment and surgical intervention, especially, and pain resulting, and the doctor is exempted from this obligation only if it is causing serious harm to the patient, and do more harm than useful.
However, a surgical condition may occur during surgery, and it is not possible for the doctor to obtain the patient's consent. The doctor may perform the required surgery on the patient based on the previous consent.
We emphasize that the surgeon or his assistant should inform the patient's close associates, usually in front of the operating room, during surgery.
The doctor should explain to the patient what happened to him and the reason for that urgent surgical intervention.
There is nothing better than establishing a relationship of trust and harmony between the patient and the doctor. And do not forget the importance of the relationship between the doctor and the patient.