The study consisted of (135) samples taken from different infections of the body (tonsils, ear, wounds, eyes, nose), of which 40 samples were taken from healthy people who were used as a control group. Swabs were taken from infected surfaces by swab ) And under the supervision of the specialist doctor at the Diwaniyah General Hospital for the period from 8/1 August to 9/15 September.
The bacteria were isolated and identified based on their phenotypic traits and their growth in the agar and macaroni macrophages, as well as on the results of the biochemical and physiological tests based on these bacteria.
The samples were obtained from different types of positive and negative bacteria of Kram and some types of bacteria and some fungi, but they were neglected because they are not currently studied. The study was limited only to the types of Gram positive bacteria, which were formed by Staph bacteria. (30.52%). The other isolates were isolated from different regions of the body. One third was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.68%), followed by Escherichia coli (12.63%). Other types of bacteria It was the lowest proportion which is respectively Staph. epidermidis, Haemophilus spp. Klebsiella pneumonia, Corynebacterium dipthheroid and by percentage (1.05,3.15,5.26,6.31), respectively.
The study was consistent with the results of some previous studies. These studies showed the prevalence of Staphylococcus (Staphylococcus Staphylococcus aureus) in the events of the infection, with the highest incidence of wounds, tonsillitis and ophthalmology followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Brook, 1980)
These types of bacteria, because of their widespread and responsible for the incidence of infection and infection in multiple places of the body, causing severe disease, where isolated by (60%) of wounds, and tonsils isolated by (35%) and eyes isolated by (36.36) Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from the nose (61.53%) and isolated from the ear (28.57).
A previous study also confirmed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria have the dominant role in ear infections. The use of improper methods to clean infected wounds and clean the external ear helps to infect some bacterial pathogens (Bed Worth, 1992). Environmental pollution is also caused by bacterial pathogens caused by contamination of water and food with these bacteria, which is a source of environmental pollution. Proteus mirabilis was infected (57.14%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (14.28%).
The source of ear infection in this type of Gram-negative bacteria and Klebsiella spp is not necessary to be from the nasal passage or through the tonsils, but it can be through the fecal contamination of the auditory tube. As for eye injuries Staph bacteria. epidermidis was (54.54%) followed by Staph. aureus (36.36%) and Corynebacterium spp (9.09%). The role of these bacteria in the infection or infection of the eye with this type of bacteria as a cause of conjunctivitis is controversial because it forms part of the natural plant of the conjunctiva, particularly Staph. epidermidis and infection occurs especially after surgery due to the use of contaminated ointments in hospitals and some types of droplets in the hospital (Stenson et al., 1982).
Hemophilus Spp (38.46%) was infected with hemophilus (S) and this was in relation to the respiratory tract (nose) and (5) positive isolates of total isolates.
As for total control, the isolated bacteria were healthy and found in different regions of the body (nose, ear, pharynx). Escherichia coli was higher than the rest of the other isolates, with 52.5% Staph bacteria. epidermidis (20%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.5%) and Staph bacteria. aureus by (10%).
The difference in the percentage of bacteria in swabs taken from sick people and healthy people may be due to variations in the size and nature of the samples. The majority of healthy people carry these bacteria naturally and continue to exist in their bodies until the appropriate conditions are available, including the low immunity of the person to turn these bacteria from their natural places to other places and become opportunistic bacteria (Nurse) and a few people who do not have these types of bacteria.
The bacteria were isolated and identified based on their phenotypic traits and their growth in the agar and macaroni macrophages, as well as on the results of the biochemical and physiological tests based on these bacteria.
The samples were obtained from different types of positive and negative bacteria of Kram and some types of bacteria and some fungi, but they were neglected because they are not currently studied. The study was limited only to the types of Gram positive bacteria, which were formed by Staph bacteria. (30.52%). The other isolates were isolated from different regions of the body. One third was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.68%), followed by Escherichia coli (12.63%). Other types of bacteria It was the lowest proportion which is respectively Staph. epidermidis, Haemophilus spp. Klebsiella pneumonia, Corynebacterium dipthheroid and by percentage (1.05,3.15,5.26,6.31), respectively.
The study was consistent with the results of some previous studies. These studies showed the prevalence of Staphylococcus (Staphylococcus Staphylococcus aureus) in the events of the infection, with the highest incidence of wounds, tonsillitis and ophthalmology followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Brook, 1980)
These types of bacteria, because of their widespread and responsible for the incidence of infection and infection in multiple places of the body, causing severe disease, where isolated by (60%) of wounds, and tonsils isolated by (35%) and eyes isolated by (36.36) Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from the nose (61.53%) and isolated from the ear (28.57).
A previous study also confirmed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria have the dominant role in ear infections. The use of improper methods to clean infected wounds and clean the external ear helps to infect some bacterial pathogens (Bed Worth, 1992). Environmental pollution is also caused by bacterial pathogens caused by contamination of water and food with these bacteria, which is a source of environmental pollution. Proteus mirabilis was infected (57.14%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (14.28%).
The source of ear infection in this type of Gram-negative bacteria and Klebsiella spp is not necessary to be from the nasal passage or through the tonsils, but it can be through the fecal contamination of the auditory tube. As for eye injuries Staph bacteria. epidermidis was (54.54%) followed by Staph. aureus (36.36%) and Corynebacterium spp (9.09%). The role of these bacteria in the infection or infection of the eye with this type of bacteria as a cause of conjunctivitis is controversial because it forms part of the natural plant of the conjunctiva, particularly Staph. epidermidis and infection occurs especially after surgery due to the use of contaminated ointments in hospitals and some types of droplets in the hospital (Stenson et al., 1982).
Hemophilus Spp (38.46%) was infected with hemophilus (S) and this was in relation to the respiratory tract (nose) and (5) positive isolates of total isolates.
As for total control, the isolated bacteria were healthy and found in different regions of the body (nose, ear, pharynx). Escherichia coli was higher than the rest of the other isolates, with 52.5% Staph bacteria. epidermidis (20%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.5%) and Staph bacteria. aureus by (10%).
The difference in the percentage of bacteria in swabs taken from sick people and healthy people may be due to variations in the size and nature of the samples. The majority of healthy people carry these bacteria naturally and continue to exist in their bodies until the appropriate conditions are available, including the low immunity of the person to turn these bacteria from their natural places to other places and become opportunistic bacteria (Nurse) and a few people who do not have these types of bacteria.