Dr. Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, President of the World Union of Muslim Scholars:
Because the shar'i, if revealed to prove the lineage, at the same time sees that the jackets are an important destination on which the social life is based; lest the unfaithfulness of those who believe in it be common, and its evidence is what the Prophet (pbuh) said to those who paid Maaz bin Malik from the declaration of adultery «Hla stabbed by the party dress».
This is based on the fact that al-Shara recognizes that "the child is for the bed." The principle of establishing the lineage is the matrimonial bed. Shara also emphasizes the crime of adultery, and it is stipulated by four witnesses. Every way other than the four witnesses is that a man and a woman commit true adultery. Prove ratios.
Moreover, shara does not punish the crime of zina, but it is punishable by recklessness and defiance, so that the person sees four people openly during the day in a statement that brings the great ones, while doing them in secret is sufficient for the concealment.
It is a rule of jurisprudence in that matter that the borders are suspicious, and if we are not sure that adultery is committed, it is not ruled, and therefore the genetic imprint is not valid in proving the descent, unless the man and woman deny it and want to prove it. ; To remove suspicion from the heart of the man, and to acquit the woman from what she accused him of.
If a man sees his wife with another, it is unreasonable to demand four witnesses to accuse his wife of adultery, to deny her son, or to accuse her of falsity and contempt, and here the judiciary must take the genetic fingerprint for two things:
- First: To prove the innocence of the woman from the charge against her.
- Second: to prove the proportion of the child to his father, so that the child does not fall into future problems.
If the husband refuses to carry out the DNA, this is evidence against him and not him, and the judge has the right to do it against the husband.
In addition, it is not permissible to regard the DNA in establishing borders, because the establishment of the limit is conditional upon seeing four witnesses to commit zina. Indeed, shara'a takes care to establish borders in a manner that is not observed in others.
As for taking the fingerprint of the couple before marriage and registering it in the government departments, so that the birth rates of the child are later known through the footprint, this is chosen, and may not force people to it. And that the invitation to register the fingerprint of parents is contrary to the decision of the Sharia of the principle of jackets.
Because the shar'i, if revealed to prove the lineage, at the same time sees that the jackets are an important destination on which the social life is based; lest the unfaithfulness of those who believe in it be common, and its evidence is what the Prophet (pbuh) said to those who paid Maaz bin Malik from the declaration of adultery «Hla stabbed by the party dress».
This is based on the fact that al-Shara recognizes that "the child is for the bed." The principle of establishing the lineage is the matrimonial bed. Shara also emphasizes the crime of adultery, and it is stipulated by four witnesses. Every way other than the four witnesses is that a man and a woman commit true adultery. Prove ratios.
Moreover, shara does not punish the crime of zina, but it is punishable by recklessness and defiance, so that the person sees four people openly during the day in a statement that brings the great ones, while doing them in secret is sufficient for the concealment.
It is a rule of jurisprudence in that matter that the borders are suspicious, and if we are not sure that adultery is committed, it is not ruled, and therefore the genetic imprint is not valid in proving the descent, unless the man and woman deny it and want to prove it. ; To remove suspicion from the heart of the man, and to acquit the woman from what she accused him of.
If a man sees his wife with another, it is unreasonable to demand four witnesses to accuse his wife of adultery, to deny her son, or to accuse her of falsity and contempt, and here the judiciary must take the genetic fingerprint for two things:
- First: To prove the innocence of the woman from the charge against her.
- Second: to prove the proportion of the child to his father, so that the child does not fall into future problems.
If the husband refuses to carry out the DNA, this is evidence against him and not him, and the judge has the right to do it against the husband.
In addition, it is not permissible to regard the DNA in establishing borders, because the establishment of the limit is conditional upon seeing four witnesses to commit zina. Indeed, shara'a takes care to establish borders in a manner that is not observed in others.
As for taking the fingerprint of the couple before marriage and registering it in the government departments, so that the birth rates of the child are later known through the footprint, this is chosen, and may not force people to it. And that the invitation to register the fingerprint of parents is contrary to the decision of the Sharia of the principle of jackets.
