Any part of the body, whether part or part of the body, may be a foreign part caused by a bug or pest.
Because the pieces were destroyed and it is corrupt, Ibn Hazm agreed unanimously on the inviolability of cutting a member, but he was authorized in the medical surgery for necessity and, more importantly, in Saheeh Muslim about Jabir, he said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) And then koah it. "
Here are a few issues:
First: Is it permissible to cut off the extra finger?
If there is no pain to call them to cut, it is not permissible, because it changed the creation of God, has gone d. Shibir to the passport under the pretext that it is a defect and lack of congenital.
But if the pain is called to be cut then it is permissible to call for it, but on the condition that there is no alternative medicine other than cutting.
Question 2: Is it permissible to cut the nerve to overcome the pain ?:
This is in a special kind of pain, which is stubborn pain, which is the severe pain that has been prevented by medical treatment, and pain is stubborn in one of the following three cases:
First: not detect the cause of pain.
Second: Difficulty treating the cause as in cancer.
Third: Lack of pain response to different analgesics.
In these cases, doctors cut off the pain and sensory signals from the pain zone to the brain and vice versa. By cutting off these nerves, the patient is relieved of the pain, and if he is said to have responded to some strong tranquilizers, the problem is that these sedatives are composed of narcotic substances such as opium and its ilk, Its longer because of the seriousness of its patient addiction which may lead to bad consequences may outweigh the pain therapist.
Which shows the permissibility of cutting to the consensus of the scholars that the member may cut off the pain and nerve part of the member if it is permissible to cut all the hardship of pain may be cut off part of the same bug, and pursuant to the rule: "hardship brings facilitation."
Third question: Is it permissible to increase the amount of the harvested portion as a precaution ?:
We have said that the origin of the sanctity of the pieces, but we paid for damage and what is permissible for the necessity of the estimated amount and therefore it is not permissible to increase the amount of the cut, but there are cases where the doctors to increase on the specific location of fear that the lesion had gone to that part more they will cut the reserve and apologize in fear And the difficulty of opening the position again, which shows here passport two conditions: to overcome the doctor and the possibility of flow and hard to open again.
Because the pieces were destroyed and it is corrupt, Ibn Hazm agreed unanimously on the inviolability of cutting a member, but he was authorized in the medical surgery for necessity and, more importantly, in Saheeh Muslim about Jabir, he said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) And then koah it. "
Here are a few issues:
First: Is it permissible to cut off the extra finger?
If there is no pain to call them to cut, it is not permissible, because it changed the creation of God, has gone d. Shibir to the passport under the pretext that it is a defect and lack of congenital.
But if the pain is called to be cut then it is permissible to call for it, but on the condition that there is no alternative medicine other than cutting.
Question 2: Is it permissible to cut the nerve to overcome the pain ?:
This is in a special kind of pain, which is stubborn pain, which is the severe pain that has been prevented by medical treatment, and pain is stubborn in one of the following three cases:
First: not detect the cause of pain.
Second: Difficulty treating the cause as in cancer.
Third: Lack of pain response to different analgesics.
In these cases, doctors cut off the pain and sensory signals from the pain zone to the brain and vice versa. By cutting off these nerves, the patient is relieved of the pain, and if he is said to have responded to some strong tranquilizers, the problem is that these sedatives are composed of narcotic substances such as opium and its ilk, Its longer because of the seriousness of its patient addiction which may lead to bad consequences may outweigh the pain therapist.
Which shows the permissibility of cutting to the consensus of the scholars that the member may cut off the pain and nerve part of the member if it is permissible to cut all the hardship of pain may be cut off part of the same bug, and pursuant to the rule: "hardship brings facilitation."
Third question: Is it permissible to increase the amount of the harvested portion as a precaution ?:
We have said that the origin of the sanctity of the pieces, but we paid for damage and what is permissible for the necessity of the estimated amount and therefore it is not permissible to increase the amount of the cut, but there are cases where the doctors to increase on the specific location of fear that the lesion had gone to that part more they will cut the reserve and apologize in fear And the difficulty of opening the position again, which shows here passport two conditions: to overcome the doctor and the possibility of flow and hard to open again.