Medical work in the French judiciary can only be performed by a doctor or a surgeon, a medical assistant under the responsibility and direct supervision of the doctor

The link between the French judiciary and the prevailing jurisprudence, where the French jurisprudence was based solely on medical treatments, was similar to that of French courts.
Initially, the Court of Cassation ruled that the admission of patients and the practice of ill-treatment methods without authorization were an illegal practice of medicine. It is understood that treatment falls under the range of medical work. The French judiciary continued to absorb other work, such as diagnosis, medical tests and tests.
 With the promulgation of the Health Act of 1945 and the extension of its control over the practice of medical professions, the Council of State has been established as a link to medical work as it exists, whether as a doctor, surgeon or other health user. According to a State Council judgment, medical work can only be performed by a doctor or surgeon, a medical assistant under the responsibility and direct control of the doctor, and in circumstances that allow him to intervene at any time.
We believe that the adoption by the French judiciary of this personal or subjective theory in medical work is in line with the evolution of these works, which deviated from the therapeutic goal, but not for non-doctors. It also allows them to be denied legal accountability for the absence of therapeutic necessity (in accordance with the principle of freedom) Medical), and stresses the practice of exotic medicine by non-doctors.
Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form