The Egyptian judiciary pursued the same path of the French judiciary in its view of medical work. At the beginning of its era, it limited the concept of medical work to the diagnosis and treatment of diseases.
Egyptian courts have ruled that the doctor's responsibility for his error in diagnosis and treatment only provides serious error. In the same context, the court of Egypt has resorted to the utmost severity in estimating the mistakes of specialist doctors because they have a duty to diagnose, , And this is understood that diagnosis and treatment is at the heart of the work of doctors.
The Court of Cassation also ruled that although the prescription of medicines to apply a correct treatment based on the right of a doctor to practice his profession, he must abide by the law, and therefore the abuse of the right to describe the drug, is not intended to medical treatment, For addicts, it requires accountability.
The development of the concept of medical work in the Egyptian legislation has led to a widening of the concept of medical work and its reflection on the judgments of the judiciary, where it succeeded in extending medical work to include operations, prescription drugs, medical consultations and drugs.
In a relatively recent ruling, the Court of Cassation went on to adopt the legal concept of medical work, considering that no one can practice the profession of medicine and carry out the acts set out in article 1 of Law No. 415 of 1954 in any capacity unless he is a registered doctor with a record Doctors at the Ministry of Health.
It is clear from the foregoing that the Egyptian judiciary has included developments in the scope of medical work, legislative or practical, which is a renewed shop for its case.
Egyptian courts have ruled that the doctor's responsibility for his error in diagnosis and treatment only provides serious error. In the same context, the court of Egypt has resorted to the utmost severity in estimating the mistakes of specialist doctors because they have a duty to diagnose, , And this is understood that diagnosis and treatment is at the heart of the work of doctors.
The Court of Cassation also ruled that although the prescription of medicines to apply a correct treatment based on the right of a doctor to practice his profession, he must abide by the law, and therefore the abuse of the right to describe the drug, is not intended to medical treatment, For addicts, it requires accountability.
The development of the concept of medical work in the Egyptian legislation has led to a widening of the concept of medical work and its reflection on the judgments of the judiciary, where it succeeded in extending medical work to include operations, prescription drugs, medical consultations and drugs.
In a relatively recent ruling, the Court of Cassation went on to adopt the legal concept of medical work, considering that no one can practice the profession of medicine and carry out the acts set out in article 1 of Law No. 415 of 1954 in any capacity unless he is a registered doctor with a record Doctors at the Ministry of Health.
It is clear from the foregoing that the Egyptian judiciary has included developments in the scope of medical work, legislative or practical, which is a renewed shop for its case.
Labels
medical errors