The Algerian judiciary has not explicitly expressed its position on the concept of medical work, according to the few or rare provisions that we have obtained, but it is about developing his vision through it.
First, diagnosis is at the core of medical work, which assesses the responsibility of the physician if it is proven that he has been wronged, wronged or denied. In this regard, the Supreme Court ruled on the responsibility of the doctor who injected a patient with insulin without prior analysis of its ability to do so. That is, he did not have a preliminary diagnosis of the type of diabetes infected, and whether treatment requires injections or not.
The Supreme Court also ruled in another decision that the doctor ordered the injection of the patient with Pénicilline, which led to his death is negligence leading to manslaughter, which requires criminal liability according to the text of Article (288)
- The necessary medical and biological analysis is complementary to the diagnostic process and prior to beginning to describe the appropriate treatment, which is therefore part of the medical work. Therefore, the failure to conduct these analyzes is a mistake that places responsibility on the owner. In this regard, the Supreme Court established criminal responsibility for doctors and nurses who transferred the blood to patients without ascertaining his faction and the future acceptance of it, causing the death of victims.
The description of the appropriate treatment and submission to the patient is one of the most famous work by the doctor. In this regard, the Higher Council went to the responsibility of the university hospital "Mustafa Pasha" and to compel him to compensate the patient who was admitted to the hospital because of a fracture in the pelvis and his left wrist. When he accepted, no medical orders were issued, This situation turned days later into a gangrene that required cutting the entire facility. This patient has not received proper treatment from the doctors, causing this negligence in the deterioration of the situation to the worst, which was considered by the Supreme Council a serious error that arranges the responsibility of the hospital facility.
The patient's medical care and medical care is considered a dangerous medical condition. The Supreme Court condemned the drug for not being subjected to artificial respiration despite the fact that it was suffocated after the operation, and did not inject it with medication to remove anesthesia, which led to its death.
- Monitoring the patient and follow up his health are considered medical work. One of the judicial applications included in this is the Supreme Court's responsibility for the manslaughter. After anesthesia, the patient left and was left under the care of another person who was not qualified, which led to the sprain of the oxygen tube and the death of the patient. In another case of medical follow-up, the Supreme Court concluded that the early discharge of the patient after an operation without confirming his or her health was considered negligent and led to the doctor being held accountable.
Following the review of these national jurisprudence, it is clear that the Algerian judiciary adopts a flexible view of the contents of medical work. This view is based on the legislative content of medical work. It expands to include and emphasizes the need for doctors to pay attention to their medical interventions. Is consistent with its jurisprudence with the Health Act that medical work includes the protection and maintenance of human health at all levels and stages of his health.
First, diagnosis is at the core of medical work, which assesses the responsibility of the physician if it is proven that he has been wronged, wronged or denied. In this regard, the Supreme Court ruled on the responsibility of the doctor who injected a patient with insulin without prior analysis of its ability to do so. That is, he did not have a preliminary diagnosis of the type of diabetes infected, and whether treatment requires injections or not.
The Supreme Court also ruled in another decision that the doctor ordered the injection of the patient with Pénicilline, which led to his death is negligence leading to manslaughter, which requires criminal liability according to the text of Article (288)
- The necessary medical and biological analysis is complementary to the diagnostic process and prior to beginning to describe the appropriate treatment, which is therefore part of the medical work. Therefore, the failure to conduct these analyzes is a mistake that places responsibility on the owner. In this regard, the Supreme Court established criminal responsibility for doctors and nurses who transferred the blood to patients without ascertaining his faction and the future acceptance of it, causing the death of victims.
The description of the appropriate treatment and submission to the patient is one of the most famous work by the doctor. In this regard, the Higher Council went to the responsibility of the university hospital "Mustafa Pasha" and to compel him to compensate the patient who was admitted to the hospital because of a fracture in the pelvis and his left wrist. When he accepted, no medical orders were issued, This situation turned days later into a gangrene that required cutting the entire facility. This patient has not received proper treatment from the doctors, causing this negligence in the deterioration of the situation to the worst, which was considered by the Supreme Council a serious error that arranges the responsibility of the hospital facility.
The patient's medical care and medical care is considered a dangerous medical condition. The Supreme Court condemned the drug for not being subjected to artificial respiration despite the fact that it was suffocated after the operation, and did not inject it with medication to remove anesthesia, which led to its death.
- Monitoring the patient and follow up his health are considered medical work. One of the judicial applications included in this is the Supreme Court's responsibility for the manslaughter. After anesthesia, the patient left and was left under the care of another person who was not qualified, which led to the sprain of the oxygen tube and the death of the patient. In another case of medical follow-up, the Supreme Court concluded that the early discharge of the patient after an operation without confirming his or her health was considered negligent and led to the doctor being held accountable.
Following the review of these national jurisprudence, it is clear that the Algerian judiciary adopts a flexible view of the contents of medical work. This view is based on the legislative content of medical work. It expands to include and emphasizes the need for doctors to pay attention to their medical interventions. Is consistent with its jurisprudence with the Health Act that medical work includes the protection and maintenance of human health at all levels and stages of his health.
Labels
medical errors