The diagnosis phase is the beginning of the physician's relationship with the patient. The medical work depends on the health of the diagnosis and its safety. If it fails, the subsequent work, especially the prescribed treatment, may be wrong, and the doctor should make careful care of the diagnosis. He must listen to the patient's complaint and take it from him and his family. All the information that he needs, and then begins to examine the patient accurately to the places of pain and the citizen using all the means put by science at his disposal, so that his opinion in the diagnosis away from the mistake as much as possible.
Diagnosis is defined as the work by which the doctor determines the disease, by limiting its characteristics, its symptoms and causes, and determines the risks of the disease in terms of patient orientation and preparations. Not far from this idea, the French judiciary went to the diagnosis is the work that determines the diseases after the knowledge of symptoms.
Diagnosis of the patient's condition is very important. The nature of the disease is determined and placed in the appropriate context. Diagnosis is a complex process of cognition, through which the patient learns from the symptoms of the patient.
The doctor is supposed to take careful care of the man found in the same external circumstances surrounding the responsible physician, and was similar to him in the certificate and specialization and in general conditions exist. The doctor should also rely on the diagnosis of all necessary medical means and equipment, and the use of scientific methods are being worked by doctors. He may use his more specialized colleagues if he doubts the nature of the disease.
In fact, the task of doctors in diagnosis is not easy. Often the symptoms are similar. The doctor is unable to know the proper diagnosis. Even the most skilled physicians have not escaped the mistake of diagnosis, despite practicing medicine for many years.
The diagnosis is related to the art and manufacture of medicine. It is the result of a very personal interpretation of the facts. The French judiciary therefore concluded that the mere error of l'erreur in diagnosis does not constitute, in principle, a doctor's fault. Therefore, there is no responsibility for the doctor for his error in the diagnosis that occurs in spite of his adherence to the technical assets, and used by all available medical means.
It should also be said that medical sciences are still in constant development, and that the methods of diagnosis and treatment are controversial among scientists. In this regard, the French Court of Cassation ruled that as long as we are still in the case of scientific research, the doctor does not ask if the error in diagnosis is due to a trade-off Scientific opinion on another.
French law has been concerned with diagnosis as a medical act, which entails the criminal responsibility of the illegal practice of medicine, where the method of diagnosis can be derived through the text of article L.4161-1 of the Public Health Act, Personal, oral or written advice and whatever method whatsoever. Because of the importance of diagnosis in the detection of serious diseases and injuries, the French legislator made it mandatory before the birth of the fetus, in order to prevent any viewer threatens his safety after pregnancy, or after the child.
The Algerian legislator has authorized the doctor to perform all the diagnostic work, taking into account his specialties and possibilities. He also urged doctors and self-employed professionals to use the necessary means and equipment for their profession, provided they did not jeopardize the patient's health or the profession's honor.
This encouragement of the use of medical means and equipment is accompanied by an important warning to members of the medical profession, both public and private, not to resort to diagnostic methods or treatment is uncertain.
The Algerian Supreme Court went on to consider the diagnosis to be one of the first stages of medical work, and ruled that the doctor was responsible for injecting a patient with insulin without disclosing its ability to do so.
In summary, diagnosis is an important stage in the life of medical work, depending on the health and accuracy of the success of treatment and healing of the patient, and allows good diagnosis in the knowledge of treatment to be followed.
Diagnosis is defined as the work by which the doctor determines the disease, by limiting its characteristics, its symptoms and causes, and determines the risks of the disease in terms of patient orientation and preparations. Not far from this idea, the French judiciary went to the diagnosis is the work that determines the diseases after the knowledge of symptoms.
Diagnosis of the patient's condition is very important. The nature of the disease is determined and placed in the appropriate context. Diagnosis is a complex process of cognition, through which the patient learns from the symptoms of the patient.
The doctor is supposed to take careful care of the man found in the same external circumstances surrounding the responsible physician, and was similar to him in the certificate and specialization and in general conditions exist. The doctor should also rely on the diagnosis of all necessary medical means and equipment, and the use of scientific methods are being worked by doctors. He may use his more specialized colleagues if he doubts the nature of the disease.
In fact, the task of doctors in diagnosis is not easy. Often the symptoms are similar. The doctor is unable to know the proper diagnosis. Even the most skilled physicians have not escaped the mistake of diagnosis, despite practicing medicine for many years.
The diagnosis is related to the art and manufacture of medicine. It is the result of a very personal interpretation of the facts. The French judiciary therefore concluded that the mere error of l'erreur in diagnosis does not constitute, in principle, a doctor's fault. Therefore, there is no responsibility for the doctor for his error in the diagnosis that occurs in spite of his adherence to the technical assets, and used by all available medical means.
It should also be said that medical sciences are still in constant development, and that the methods of diagnosis and treatment are controversial among scientists. In this regard, the French Court of Cassation ruled that as long as we are still in the case of scientific research, the doctor does not ask if the error in diagnosis is due to a trade-off Scientific opinion on another.
French law has been concerned with diagnosis as a medical act, which entails the criminal responsibility of the illegal practice of medicine, where the method of diagnosis can be derived through the text of article L.4161-1 of the Public Health Act, Personal, oral or written advice and whatever method whatsoever. Because of the importance of diagnosis in the detection of serious diseases and injuries, the French legislator made it mandatory before the birth of the fetus, in order to prevent any viewer threatens his safety after pregnancy, or after the child.
The Algerian legislator has authorized the doctor to perform all the diagnostic work, taking into account his specialties and possibilities. He also urged doctors and self-employed professionals to use the necessary means and equipment for their profession, provided they did not jeopardize the patient's health or the profession's honor.
This encouragement of the use of medical means and equipment is accompanied by an important warning to members of the medical profession, both public and private, not to resort to diagnostic methods or treatment is uncertain.
The Algerian Supreme Court went on to consider the diagnosis to be one of the first stages of medical work, and ruled that the doctor was responsible for injecting a patient with insulin without disclosing its ability to do so.
In summary, diagnosis is an important stage in the life of medical work, depending on the health and accuracy of the success of treatment and healing of the patient, and allows good diagnosis in the knowledge of treatment to be followed.
Labels
medical errors