After the doctor diagnoses the disease, he proceeds to describe the appropriate treatment for the patient, consistent with his health and physical condition. The general principle of treatment is the freedom of the physician to choose the most suitable one for the patient. This is a fundamental issue that must be respected by the judiciary, since the profession of medicine, like other liberal professions, is characterized by the existence of personal initiative as a prominent feature.
In fact, the judiciary respected the privacy of the medical profession and dedicated the freedom of doctors to choose their treatments. The French Court of Aix ruled that the surgeon had the freedom to choose the method of treatment that seemed to him to be correct and appropriate for the situation before him. The Liège Court stated that it is not for the judge to intervene in the search for a physician to favor a method of other treatment or surgery.
The same approach went to the Egyptian judiciary, that the doctor is asking about his error in the treatment when the error that was signed by him apparently does not tolerate any technical discussion, but if it is related to scientific issues different doctors around and saw the doctor to follow the theory without the other blame it.
The doctor should take into account in the description of treatment the patient's structure and age and the strength of the disease and the state of mental health to come treatment is appropriate, the disease does not have one cure in all cases, and the benefit of a patient in treatment may harm another patient infected with the same disease, even said that there is no diseases But patients. However, the doctor's freedom to prescribe treatment is not absolute, but is restricted by a number of controls, the most important of which is the observance of the rules and scientific assets fixed, and take utmost care, caution and vigilance when describing treatment.
If it is difficult for a doctor to keep pace with developments in the field of medical sciences, at least it is necessary to know the important new ways, because the practice of treatment in a different way and resort to a method abandoned by colleagues would lead to his responsibility.
Usually, the doctor releases the post-diagnosis treatment in the prescription, which is defined as: "A written document, edited by the physician, which includes the patient's condition from the diagnosis, or a specific regulation that requires the patient to follow or prescribe medication to treat the disease. the last".
The medical prescription, which some jurists consider to be medical work, should be a mini-field that clearly shows all the obligations imposed on the doctor in the field of medical work: diagnosis, choice of treatment, conformity with available scientific data, and the need to contain all legal data , Because it is a document of proof of the relationship between the doctor and the patient, and thus contribute to reducing the burden of proof of who is required, if included information necessary.
It should be noted that, and with the possibility of the doctor to use new methods in the freedom of treatment, it is not allowed to try a new and uncertain method of treatment or the results are not known firmly.
In fact, the judiciary respected the privacy of the medical profession and dedicated the freedom of doctors to choose their treatments. The French Court of Aix ruled that the surgeon had the freedom to choose the method of treatment that seemed to him to be correct and appropriate for the situation before him. The Liège Court stated that it is not for the judge to intervene in the search for a physician to favor a method of other treatment or surgery.
The same approach went to the Egyptian judiciary, that the doctor is asking about his error in the treatment when the error that was signed by him apparently does not tolerate any technical discussion, but if it is related to scientific issues different doctors around and saw the doctor to follow the theory without the other blame it.
The doctor should take into account in the description of treatment the patient's structure and age and the strength of the disease and the state of mental health to come treatment is appropriate, the disease does not have one cure in all cases, and the benefit of a patient in treatment may harm another patient infected with the same disease, even said that there is no diseases But patients. However, the doctor's freedom to prescribe treatment is not absolute, but is restricted by a number of controls, the most important of which is the observance of the rules and scientific assets fixed, and take utmost care, caution and vigilance when describing treatment.
If it is difficult for a doctor to keep pace with developments in the field of medical sciences, at least it is necessary to know the important new ways, because the practice of treatment in a different way and resort to a method abandoned by colleagues would lead to his responsibility.
Usually, the doctor releases the post-diagnosis treatment in the prescription, which is defined as: "A written document, edited by the physician, which includes the patient's condition from the diagnosis, or a specific regulation that requires the patient to follow or prescribe medication to treat the disease. the last".
The medical prescription, which some jurists consider to be medical work, should be a mini-field that clearly shows all the obligations imposed on the doctor in the field of medical work: diagnosis, choice of treatment, conformity with available scientific data, and the need to contain all legal data , Because it is a document of proof of the relationship between the doctor and the patient, and thus contribute to reducing the burden of proof of who is required, if included information necessary.
It should be noted that, and with the possibility of the doctor to use new methods in the freedom of treatment, it is not allowed to try a new and uncertain method of treatment or the results are not known firmly.
Labels
medical errors